Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 06 Apr 1999 22:11:37 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        paul@originative.co.uk, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: EGCS optimizations 
Message-ID:  <63443.923429497@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Apr 1999 13:01:07 PDT." <199904062001.NAA10310@apollo.backplane.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199904062001.NAA10310@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon writes:

>    That test was 100% cpu bound.  There was no ( significant ) I/O.  I ran
>    it a few times to build the cache before timing it.

What is the stddev on your measurements ?

a delta-T  1 second need a very tight stddev to be significant.


--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?63443.923429497>