Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 19:32:07 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.win.tue.nl> To: mikee@solozzo.tele.pw.edu.pl (Adam Kubicki) Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why is -stable not secure? Message-ID: <199612161832.TAA25027@gvr.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <199612161654.IAA16978@freefall.freebsd.org> from Adam Kubicki at "Dec 16, 96 05:59:06 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adam Kubicki wrote: > hi, > > I'd like to ask why patches included in -current aren't in -stable > version? There are few serious bugs (security too) fixed in -current but not > in -stable. How long it takes to move patches to -stable source tree?? > Normally they are fixed in both. The recent cron things have been overlooked unfortunately. -Guido
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612161832.TAA25027>