Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:55:49 -0600 From: Brad Guillory <round@baileylink.net> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports security advisories.. Message-ID: <20000320155548.E59294@baileylink.net> In-Reply-To: <20000320154614.A63670@elvis.mu.org>; from dave@mu.org on Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 03:46:14PM -0600 References: <20000320154614.A63670@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I would like to see them stay. If I have a port installed it is nice to know that SA's regarding that port will come to this list. The bandwidth used is far less than the bandwidth used by people who sign every post that they make. ;-) BMG On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 03:46:14PM -0600, Dave McKay wrote: > Is it really necessary to post the ports security advisories? > The exploitable programs are not part of the FreeBSD OS, they > are third party software. I think the proper place for these > is the Bugtraq mailing list on securityfocus.com. Also to add > to the arguments, most of the advisories are not FreeBSD > specific. > > -- > Dave McKay > Network Engineer - Google Inc. > dave@mu.org - dave@google.com > I'm feeling lucky... -- __O _-\<,_ Why drive when you can bike? (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000320155548.E59294>