Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:36:51 +0000 From: "=?utf-8?B?TG/Dr2MgQmxvdA==?=" <loic.blot@unix-experience.fr> To: "Julian Elischer" <julian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fib issue with jails. Message-ID: <5756f4ab845cd5bb738f6b87d497b9d0@mail.unix-experience.fr> In-Reply-To: <54F432B4.7050602@freebsd.org> References: <54F432B4.7050602@freebsd.org> <54F427EA.2010406@freebsd.org> <54F4205D.1030405@freebsd.org> <bc15cc61e9557bd654cc90ed8d9a2234@mail.unix-experience.fr> <c75e82ebe1786b5e8c756abed4088aea@mail.unix-experience.fr> <4aadb320a6608ae86ffe4b28fb747b0e@mail.unix-experience.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmmm sorry Julian, in fact everything works perfect... somebody has changed by F5 master/slave and the current master wasn't synced for network and doesn't route ... This is solved. No problem with Fib + Vlan + Lagg :) Sorry for the inconvenience Regards, Loïc Blot, UNIX Systems, Network and Security Engineer http://www.unix-experience.fr 2 mars 2015 10:52 "Julian Elischer" <julian@freebsd.org> a écrit: > On 3/2/15 1:37 AM, Loïc Blot wrote: > >> In fact, if i use setfib on the host, not in the jail and i do a setfib ping 192.168.1.1 it's not >> working. The mac address is correct in the packet (default router) but the packet stays on VLAN >> inteface and doesn't use lag > > confirming from your other email, > if you set the same route in fib0 (or maybe just a very specific one > to 192 168.1.1 so that you don't break your system), > then you see identical packets on the vlan, and they do go to the lagg, > where ones done with a setfib at the same time, do not. > but before the reboot both would have worked. > > Do the packets turn up somewhere else? or do they just disappear? > I'm assuming you have tried multiple reboots and also doing the set up > sequence by hand slowly? > > Unfortunatly, while I do understand the fib code generally, I know > nothing about lagg. > > If you set this up by hand, what is the full list of commands you > would have to do to get to this state? > > does it make a difference if the order is not the same? > (e.g. if you set up the fib before or after the lagg?) > it might be that the lag doesn't set itself up for multiple fibs if > there is only one at the time > that it is started, or maybe it's the other way around, and that the > fibs are not set onto interfaces > that do not exist when their routes are set... > > try both ways.. > > (I'll look in the morning.. it's late here now) > >> Regards, >> >> Loïc Blot, >> UNIX Systems, Network and Security Engineer >> http://www.unix-experience.fr >> >> 2 mars 2015 10:06 "Julian Elischer" <julian@freebsd.org> a écrit: >>> On 3/2/15 12:44 AM, Loïc Blot wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Julian, >>>> >>>> with tcpdump i see the packet on vlan136 but i don't see it on lagg0, whereas it must appear. >>>> >>>> it was working without vnet/vimage before the reboot. >>> >>> so my guess is that it is independent of the fib part.. >>> >>> If you make a jail with normal fib, but set routes to use vlan136 >>> where do the packets go? >>>> Regards, >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5756f4ab845cd5bb738f6b87d497b9d0>