Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:35:28 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/cpio Makefile bsdcpio.1 cmdline.c config_freebsd.h cpio.c cpio.h cpio_platform.h err.c matching.c matching.h pathmatch.c pathmatch.h src/usr.bin/cpio/test Makefile main.c test.h test_0.c test_basic.c test_format_newc.c ... Message-ID: <20080528013528.GA97270@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <483AFE87.6020103@freebsd.org> References: <200805261715.m4QHFZUK070554@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080526172717.GA93432@freebsd.org> <483AFE87.6020103@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:16:39AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > I'm looking forward to when we can remove both GNU cpio and our current > pax implementation from the tree, I don't see a reason to remove pax from the tree. It is already BSDL'ed and is faster than libarchive based archivers. Please take this a request to not remove pax. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080528013528.GA97270>