Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:56:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Saifi Khan <saifi.khan@twincling.org> Cc: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ASL 2.0 based software contribution to FreeBSD code base Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903120755130.61873@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903120841160.9463@localhost> References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903111340230.5968@localhost> <012E1E4D-4C4E-414E-971E-ADCC48EB0698@mac.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903120723130.9463@localhost> <20090312025921.GA17420@zim.MIT.EDU> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903120841160.9463@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Saifi Khan wrote: > On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, David Schultz wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009, Saifi Khan wrote: >>> Is there anything specified in the FreeBSD project, that would prohibit >>> ASL 2.0 licensed device drivers from being used in the OS ? >> >> No, but core@ would have to approve it. I presume their decision would take >> into consideration technical justification, terms of the license, and how >> the proposed code interacts with other components in the base system. > > Great ! Thats very encouraging. Thanks Dave. > > System code (drivers included) released under standard ASL 2.0 license > should work. If you submit components under the ASL license, they will not be accepted back into the base tree without the involvement of the FreeBSD Foundation lawyers and an administrative decision involving the core team. This is expensive and time-consuming (generally a multi-month process to approve new licenses), and we would really all rather you didn't put us in the position of having to choose between adopting your software and saving a lot of time and money. If you can use a BSD license, please do. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903120755130.61873>