Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:41:39 -0800 (PST) From: David Babler <root@Rigel.orionsys.com> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: FreeBSD Questions List <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: hosts.allow for inetd internals? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003290919050.3123-100000@Rigel.orionsys.com> In-Reply-To: <19047.954320839@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:10:05 PST, David Babler wrote: > > > Quick question... couldn't find an answer in the archives. Is it possible > > to selectively apply host.allow restrictions on processes (specifically > > auth/ident) that are internal to inetd, and if so, what process name > > applies? > > Yes. The difference is that you use the canonical service name (instead > of the daemon name) in /etc/hosts.allow. Thank you, Sheldon! > PS: This is covered in the inetd(8) manual page. I'm not telling you > off; I just don't want you to think that this is arcane wisdom. Doh! So it is... I kept reading the bits about the internal ident server flags and got to the reference to hosts_access(5) and then expected to find the details there. -Dave To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003290919050.3123-100000>