Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 16:32:20 +0000 (GMT) From: eagle <eagle@eagle.phc.igs.net> To: Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net> Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: EGCS optimizations Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990406163109.76265C-100000@eagle.phc.igs.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904052235060.55808-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > There is nothing beyond -O2. Well, there's -O3, which tries to > > inline static functions, but that typically isn't beneficial because > > it really bloats up the code and subroutine calls on intel cpus are > > very fast. > > Really? > > The pgcc web page (goof.com/pcg) lead me to believe that there were a few > more optimizations turned on by -O5 && -O6.. pgcc isn't the same as egcs the current -mpentiumpro and -mpentiumarch stuff were taken from pgcc and ported back to egcs but i believe that pgcc has gone way beyond what it was when that happened. rob To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990406163109.76265C-100000>