Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Nov 1998 20:02:27 -0800 (PST)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To:        Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org>
Cc:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Is it soup yet? :-) 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.981111195924.16947C-100000@current1.whistle.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811112136300.725-100000@janus.syracuse.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Brian Feldman wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> > hackish or not here's the picture..
> > The automatic upgrade provedure cannot replace bootblocks.
> > however we will soon only be able to profuce kernels the existing
> > bootblocks can't read/load.
> > 
> > they look for a a.out file called /kernel
> > 
> > we give them one.
> > 
> > These are "embedded" FreeBSD machines.
> > they are all over the world.
> > We are certainly not in the position of bringing each back to the factory!
> > 
> > julian
> > 
> What exactly was wrong about having the old boot loader run (via
> boot.config) /boot/loader, and /boot/loader loading either an ELF or a.out
> /kernel? It works perfectly in this case, where I'm using all defaults in
> this case. And in an "embedded" system, wouldn't the
> partitioning/slicing/drive scheme be simplistic anyway?

the existing bootblocks predate "Boot.conf"

I think just changing the name of the 3rd stage boot to /kernel will do
the job nicely. There are lots of issues I can't really go into.



> 
> Cheers,
> Brian Feldman
> 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.981111195924.16947C-100000>