Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:29:11 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Darrel <levitch@iglou.com> Cc: matthew@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc Message-ID: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209031147260.6464@shell1> (Darrel's message of "Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:08:25 -0400 (EDT)") References: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209031147260.6464@shell1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Darrel <levitch@iglou.com> writes: > Thanks, Matthew- and especially for mentioning to use -F on the first > subsequent run of mergemaster. > >> >> svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 src >> > > For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: > svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports > > or can the most recent ports be run with a release, like this: > svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head ports > > Someone off of the list recommended something like this: > > svn co svn://svn.penx.com/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src > svn co svn://svn.penx.com/ports/head /usr/ports I would expect ports to still be best with head, as I haven't heard anything about branching it. I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used with subversion.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44ehmj1354.fsf>