Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:40:32 +0200 From: Andreas Hermann Braml <a.strich.b@web.de> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multimedia/ffmpeg symbol build Message-ID: <200808212340.32346.a.strich.b@web.de> In-Reply-To: <20080820233212.GA6951@bacardi.frase.id.au> References: <20080819030640.GC4326@bacardi.frase.id.au> <200808201101.39613.a.strich.b@web.de> <20080820233212.GA6951@bacardi.frase.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thursday 21 August 2008 01:32:13 Fraser Tweedale wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:01:33AM +0200, Andreas Hermann Braml wrote: > > Wait, I remember something (from my Gentoo days). There was a policy that > > MPlayer upstream did ignore any bugs filed against the Gentoo build of > > MPlayer (which uses ffmpeg libraries) due to Gentoo's brave compiler > > flags. Perhaps the ffmpeg developers treat bugs against the FreeBSD port > > the same way? I really don't know, but it might be better to check with > > the ffmpeg devs first? > > I think you misunderstood. I submitted a patch not to the ffmpeg > developers, but rather a patch for the port to the FreeBSD PR database. No, I got that. My thinking was as follows: The *_g binaries are for debugging. But what if upstream rejects (or ignores) bug reports against the FreeBSD port-built binaries? But on second thought they may still be useful to debug the _port_, so my concerns might be void after all. pseudoruprecht -- "Verbal messages cause misunderstanding and delays (Please put them in writing)" Fußzeile der Vordrucke für Inter-Office Communication bei Warner Bros., um 1950 [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIreDQ3IZTv9g6VHkRAkvZAJ4/9NnFIE8PDijXMczy8v5O1liDhgCgks+O CK3ywyeGySSLBm7yQ1argng= =zRWe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200808212340.32346.a.strich.b>