Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:42:59 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Subject: Re: nss_ldap broken Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10404011141270.23686-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20040401153815.GD60392@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 10:16:25AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > I think the best way is to avoid having shared libraries needlessly linked to > > a threads library. > > If we can guarantee that -pthread would give that behavior ``forever'', > then great. I guess we've come full circle (``-pthread good'' > ``-pthread bad, don't use it'' ``-pthread good''). :-) > > Then how does one pick an alternate threading library? Say `libmap' and Override PTHREAD_LIBS to be -lthrlibofchoice for the port you are building. > I'll choke. :-) I seem to recall that one of the GCC guys made a > detailed proposal for extending the syntax of `-pthread' to handle > alternate threading libraries, but I can't find that posting right now. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10404011141270.23686-100000>