Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:12:53 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bug in devfs_strategy() ??? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990127150747.10452P-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199901272201.OAA61764@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
yes, though luckily it turns out to not matter.
except possibly on tapes..
the 2nd call in the raw case will probably finish immediatly
as the B_DONE flag will be set.
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Aren't there are few BREAK statements missing from this ?
>
> -Matt
> Matthew Dillon
> <dillon@backplane.com>
>
> static int
> devfs_strategy(struct vop_strategy_args *ap)
> {
> ...
> switch (ap->a_vp->v_type) {
> case VCHR:
> (*dnp->by.Cdev.cdevsw->d_strategy)(bp);
> case VBLK:
> (*dnp->by.Bdev.bdevsw->d_strategy)(bp);
> }
> return (0);
> }
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.990127150747.10452P-100000>