Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:38:50 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: attilio@freebsd.org Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r204309 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 amd64/isa conf i386/bios i386/cpufreq i386/i386 i386/isa i386/xen isa modules/bios/smbios modules/bios/vpd modules/cpufreq pc98/pc98 x86 x86/bios x86/... Message-ID: <20100225.163850.864172011105110621.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <201002251413.o1PEDdKV033584@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201002251413.o1PEDdKV033584@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <201002251413.o1PEDdKV033584@svn.freebsd.org>
Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: Author: attilio
: Date: Thu Feb 25 14:13:39 2010
: New Revision: 204309
: URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/204309
:
: Log:
: Introduce the new kernel sub-tree x86 which should contain all the code
: shared and generalized between our current amd64, i386 and pc98.
:
: This is just an initial step that should lead to a more complete effort.
: For the moment, a very simple porting of cpufreq modules, BIOS calls and
: the whole MD specific ISA bus part is added to the sub-tree but ideally
: a lot of code might be added and more shared support should grow.
Cool!
: Sponsored by: Sandvine Incorporated
: Reviewed by: emaste, kib, jhb, imp
: Discussed on: arch
: MFC: 3 weeks
Is this really wise? Are these changes KPI neutral?
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100225.163850.864172011105110621.imp>