Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:51:57 -0600 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: "Guy Helmer" <ghelmer@palisadesys.com> Cc: <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd Makefile Message-ID: <018101c1cf7f$86f601b0$d800a8c0@dwcjr> References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203191253290.12151-100000@magellan.palisadesys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Basically the portable would require less hacking to run on freebsd. They > > are Both from OpenBSD so there shouldn't be any disadvantage. > > The "portable" openssh contains extra code to support other non-BSD O/S's. > To me, this implies the portable openssh contains code we don't need and > it may have security implications. I see this as a disadvantage. You could also argue that it also contains extra code for other BSD O/S's that OpenBSD does not need. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?018101c1cf7f$86f601b0$d800a8c0>