Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:52:10 +0400 From: igor <igor@soumenkov.com> To: <davidxu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/156567: [kqueue] [patch] Add EV_CLEAR to AIO events in kqueue Message-ID: <1285373c046dd1bf18c6d93f9fb6b874@soumenkov.com> In-Reply-To: <4F27A076.60009@gmail.com> References: <ef8ed17f05602de0bbbf3a247b81b224@soumenkov.com> <4F27A076.60009@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello David, The only thing I changed is the value of the flag, this is the only meaning of the patch. I do not know who decided to place the value there. On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:04:06 +0800, David Xu wrote: > On 2012/1/31 4:47, igor wrote: > >> Dear all, What can I do to get my patch finally applied or rejected (hope not :) ? My PR is not even assigned to anyone. Should I do my best to become a committer (how? :-) ? The solution I propose finally allows to use kqueue with aio in multi-threaded applications. The only reason I created it is because I wanted to use it for myself and it worked flawlessly. Please, anyone? > > It is better to allocate a member field from struct sigevent for kevent > flags, we have spare fields available there, please check the union > _sigev_un. > > Regards, > David Xu -- Igor Soumenkov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1285373c046dd1bf18c6d93f9fb6b874>