Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:09:32 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r210409 - in head/sys: conf crypto/aesni modules modules/aesni Message-ID: <20100723140932.GU2381@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20100723140744.GA88880@FreeBSD.org> References: <201007231100.o6NB0kcK069153@svn.freebsd.org> <20100723140744.GA88880@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 02:07:44PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:00:46AM +0000, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Author: kib > > Date: Fri Jul 23 11:00:46 2010 > > New Revision: 210409 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/210409 > > > > Log: > > Crypto(4) driver for AESNI. > > > > The aeskeys_{amd64,i386}.S content was mostly obtained from OpenBSD, > > no objections to the license from core. > > If code was mostly obtained from OpenBSD, why license does not credit > it? Should it ? OpenBSD took Intel code. There is no OpenBSD copyright on the files in the OpenBSD repo. The files already have enough sad history behind them. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkxJopsACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4iiRgCfX5K0Z+YPt+uq8cZl3S0sywgf /UMAoKMi0QxwRjcOnIf/tvBq/IHi6Ge5 =N6eI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100723140932.GU2381>