Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:54:32 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Robin P. Blanchard" <robin.blanchard@gactr.uga.edu> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Processes blocked on ufs or getblk Message-ID: <1318.1075323272@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:51:17 EST." <EE3D3FBAFFCAED448C21C398FDAD91AC013BDE74@EBE1.gc.nat>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <EE3D3FBAFFCAED448C21C398FDAD91AC013BDE74@EBE1.gc.nat>, "Robin P. Bl anchard" writes: > >> >Given the lockedvnod message: >> >Locked vnodes >> >0xc7003378: tag ufs, type VREG, usecount 2, writecount 0, >> refcount 1, >> >flags (VV_OBJBUF), lock type ufs: EXCL (count 1) by thread >> 0xc6066d20 (pid 81250) >> > ino 2523831, on dev aacd0s1g (4, 26) >> > >> >Should I substitue aacd0s1g (disk+slice+part) for ad0 in your above >> >example ? Or should I be using disk or disk+slice ? >> >> Just aacd0 should do. >> > >Unfortunately, that didn't help...Thanks for the suggestion, though. Ok, it worked for the ata problem sos@ just committed a fix for, but obviously the aac related problem is something entirely different. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1318.1075323272>