Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:48:55 +0100 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r204309 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 amd64/isa conf i386/bios i386/cpufreq i386/i386 i386/isa i386/xen isa modules/bios/smbios modules/bios/vpd modules/cpufreq pc98/pc98 x86 x86/bios x86/... Message-ID: <3bbf2fe11002251548y773c661gd4946f371bcbbd6f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100225.163850.864172011105110621.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <201002251413.o1PEDdKV033584@svn.freebsd.org> <20100225.163850.864172011105110621.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/2/26 M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>: > In message: <201002251413.o1PEDdKV033584@svn.freebsd.org> > Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org> writes: > : Author: attilio > : Date: Thu Feb 25 14:13:39 2010 > : New Revision: 204309 > : URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/204309 > : > : Log: > : Introduce the new kernel sub-tree x86 which should contain all the code > : shared and generalized between our current amd64, i386 and pc98. > : > : This is just an initial step that should lead to a more complete effort. > : For the moment, a very simple porting of cpufreq modules, BIOS calls and > : the whole MD specific ISA bus part is added to the sub-tree but ideally > : a lot of code might be added and more shared support should grow. > > Cool! > > : Sponsored by: Sandvine Incorporated > : Reviewed by: emaste, kib, jhb, imp > : Discussed on: arch > : MFC: 3 weeks > > Is this really wise? Are these changes KPI neutral? I don't think there are (still) KPI changes. Which one are you referring to? Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3bbf2fe11002251548y773c661gd4946f371bcbbd6f>