Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 23:19:29 +0100 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: doc/ tree slushie Message-ID: <20031020221929.GF3708@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20031020161606.GA56817@intruder.kitchenlab.org> References: <200310190613.h9J6DAnB035928@intruder.kitchenlab.org> <200310200414.h9K4EInB049618@intruder.kitchenlab.org> <3F936C7E.9020904@centtech.com> <20031020151209.GA55608@intruder.kitchenlab.org> <20031020152939.GE3708@submonkey.net> <20031020161606.GA56817@intruder.kitchenlab.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:16:06AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > Could I throw out the idea of committing the attached diff before that > > happens? I know that we normally do this after doc/ has been tagged, > > but that has always seemed strange to me, as the documentation tagged > > as 4.9-RELEASE doesn't contain any references to it. > > > > Of course, the downside is that the website will reflect things that > > don't exist yet. > > Well, the way I usually like to do this is to tag first (with the doc/ > tree in a usable state), then change certain files that have version > numbers in them, and then slide the tags on those files. As you > correctly implied, it doesn't always work that way. :-) I didn't actually realise that you slid the tags at a later date; if that's the case then you should pretend I never said anything. Ceri -- [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/lF9xocfcwTS3JF8RArpaAJ9zN5OA6T+RYOtYFTuA/QVjjpDjtgCdHjNV TjAZt+buFo6jXayN4sexJl0= =FXqi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031020221929.GF3708>