Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:26:36 +0200
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        d@delphij.net
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/libvmime Makefile
Message-ID:  <1216808796.71570.18.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
In-Reply-To: <4887062C.2010301@delphij.net>
References:  <200807230057.m6N0vjdA087753@repoman.freebsd.org> <4886952F.3080705@delphij.net> <1216800133.71570.4.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4887062C.2010301@delphij.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Xin LI píše v st 23. 07. 2008 v 03:21 -0700:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> | Xin LI píše v út 22. 07. 2008 v 19:19 -0700:
> |> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> |> Hash: SHA1
> |>
> |> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> |> | pav         2008-07-23 00:57:45 UTC
> |> |
> |> |   FreeBSD ports repository
> |> |
> |> |   Modified files:
> |> |     mail/libvmime        Makefile
> |> |   Log:
> |> |   - Mark BROKEN: does not compile with gnutls-2.4.x
> |>
> |> Er, why, how can we say this version of gnutls is not broken when they
> |> have this?
> |>
> |> ~  typedef enum gnutls_certificate_print_formats
> |> ~    {
> |> ~      GNUTLS_CRT_PRINT_FULL,
> |> ~      GNUTLS_CRT_PRINT_ONELINE,
> |> ~      GNUTLS_CRT_PRINT_UNSIGNED_FULL,   // extra ","
> |> ~    } gnutls_certificate_print_formats_t;
> |
> | I don't mind if it's fixed in libvmime or in gnutls port, as long as it
> | get fixed.
> 
> Unfortunately this can *NOT* be fixed in libvmime because gnutls's
> include file is broken.  By making an instance of
> gnutls_certificate_print_formats_t the compiler would notice the problem
> immediately.
> 
> | BTW it's still this way in gnutls git.
> 
> I have submitted ticket #770 on gnutls trac.  Just because it is still
> in gnutls git does not mean that it is correct.  Can we fix the (broken)
> security/gnutls, rather than mark (the non-broken) libvmime broken?  The
> port works just fine with patched gnutls.

I'm all for it. Guess it depends on gnutls port maintainer now.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

Can't sing. Can't dance. Can handle a sword a little.

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAkiHB1wACgkQntdYP8FOsoK5jwCdHvYj0ARSf8dwtRc7Y/sJM7Ou
8f4An22oPIZm+DroHXWJhIjtjRlbTKK0
=UG9s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1216808796.71570.18.camel>