Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:26:36 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: d@delphij.net Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/libvmime Makefile Message-ID: <1216808796.71570.18.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <4887062C.2010301@delphij.net> References: <200807230057.m6N0vjdA087753@repoman.freebsd.org> <4886952F.3080705@delphij.net> <1216800133.71570.4.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4887062C.2010301@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-KEOOxJbFFol24XQKo3uh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xin LI p=ED=B9e v st 23. 07. 2008 v 03:21 -0700:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> | Xin LI p=ED=B9e v =FAt 22. 07. 2008 v 19:19 -0700:
> |> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> |> Hash: SHA1
> |>
> |> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> |> | pav 2008-07-23 00:57:45 UTC
> |> |
> |> | FreeBSD ports repository
> |> |
> |> | Modified files:
> |> | mail/libvmime Makefile
> |> | Log:
> |> | - Mark BROKEN: does not compile with gnutls-2.4.x
> |>
> |> Er, why, how can we say this version of gnutls is not broken when they
> |> have this?
> |>
> |> ~ typedef enum gnutls_certificate_print_formats
> |> ~ {
> |> ~ GNUTLS_CRT_PRINT_FULL,
> |> ~ GNUTLS_CRT_PRINT_ONELINE,
> |> ~ GNUTLS_CRT_PRINT_UNSIGNED_FULL, // extra ","
> |> ~ } gnutls_certificate_print_formats_t;
> |
> | I don't mind if it's fixed in libvmime or in gnutls port, as long as it
> | get fixed.
>=20
> Unfortunately this can *NOT* be fixed in libvmime because gnutls's
> include file is broken. By making an instance of
> gnutls_certificate_print_formats_t the compiler would notice the problem
> immediately.
>=20
> | BTW it's still this way in gnutls git.
>=20
> I have submitted ticket #770 on gnutls trac. Just because it is still
> in gnutls git does not mean that it is correct. Can we fix the (broken)
> security/gnutls, rather than mark (the non-broken) libvmime broken? The
> port works just fine with patched gnutls.
I'm all for it. Guess it depends on gnutls port maintainer now.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Can't sing. Can't dance. Can handle a sword a little.
--=-KEOOxJbFFol24XQKo3uh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAkiHB1wACgkQntdYP8FOsoK5jwCdHvYj0ARSf8dwtRc7Y/sJM7Ou
8f4An22oPIZm+DroHXWJhIjtjRlbTKK0
=UG9s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-KEOOxJbFFol24XQKo3uh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1216808796.71570.18.camel>