Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:58:59 -0500
From:      Josh Paetzel <jpaetzel@FreeBSD.org>
To:        svn-src-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r323770 - in stable/11/sys: amd64/conf arm64/conf i386/conf powerpc/conf riscv/conf sparc64/conf
Message-ID:  <1505915939.3128744.1112434136.0864CA5F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <2B7D21C6-56EE-4ADE-815C-70477C137A82@gmail.com>
References:  <201709191651.v8JGpp5v048489@repo.freebsd.org> <2B7D21C6-56EE-4ADE-815C-70477C137A82@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Wed, Sep 20, 2017, at 02:41 AM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote:
>=20
> > On Sep 19, 2017, at 09:51, Josh Paetzel <jpaetzel@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >=20
> > Author: jpaetzel
> > Date: Tue Sep 19 16:51:51 2017
> > New Revision: 323770
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/323770
> >=20
> > Log:
> >  MFC: 323068
> >=20
> >    Allow kldload tcpmd5
>=20
> Wasn=E2=80=99t this reverted on ^/head ?
> Thanks,
> -Ngie
> Email had 1 attachment:
> + signature.asc
>   1k (application/pgp-signature)


Not this one.  What was reverted on HEAD was the removal of options
IPSEC from GENERIC.

The endgoal is options IPSEC and options IPSEC_SUPPORT in GENERIC, which
will allow someone running GENERIC to kldload tcpmd5

I think it's clear that removing options IPSEC from GENERIC was the
wrong way to go. (There was consensus on the phabricator review, not so
much once it was committed.)

--=20

Thanks,

Josh Paetzel



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1505915939.3128744.1112434136.0864CA5F>