Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:19:13 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports Message-ID: <4F100521.7040005@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F100209.2010900@gmail.com> References: <CA%2BdUSyrV_j8GtxS4=yN-DsFCprQ7N%2BEmuRoraDwBLZN1EFFR9w@mail.gmail.com> <4F100209.2010900@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no > kernel incompatible changes were introduced? Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can change the various API/KPI/etc. in the newer branch. Doug -- You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F100521.7040005>