Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:07:40 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r201227 - in head: sbin/comcontrol sbin/mount sbin/mount_msdosfs sbin/mount_nullfs sbin/rcorder usr.bin/find usr.bin/gencat usr.bin/mklocale usr.sbin/config usr.sbin/cpucontrol usr.sbin... Message-ID: <4B3AA7DC.1040606@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200912292253.nBTMrR5m038869@svn.freebsd.org> References: <200912292253.nBTMrR5m038869@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 2009. 12. 29. 23:53, Ed Schouten escribió: > Author: ed > Date: Tue Dec 29 22:53:27 2009 > New Revision: 201227 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/201227 > > Log: > ANSIfy almost all applications that use WARNS=6. > > I was considering committing all these patches one by one, but as > discussed with brooks@, there is no need to do this. If we ever > need/want to merge these changes back, it is still possible to do this > per application. > I wonder if it would be worth to invent a WARNS=7 level, which would be WARNS=6 + ANSI. Although ANSI-conformance isn't a -Wfoo flag, which is WARNS for but conforming ANSI means a higher level cleannes, which is demanded, so I think it wouldn't really contradict to the semantics of WARNS. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B3AA7DC.1040606>