Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:11:00 -0700
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To:        Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Well, there goes Windows!
Message-ID:  <64622705-80AB-4FEF-91E9-8F3041818B4E@xcllnt.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E517978.2020705@freebsd.org>
References:  <CAGH67wRFP9nFQLr0Gh-h4rKWrndZSy=6Q%2BKLC_U5Fg4RD%2BJMCw@mail.gmail.com> <4E4DB9A7.4040404@freebsd.org> <CAGH67wQoXOju3=OTh%2B6JoKLxkp7Vzqu8vg%2BO9X=DPXB5EkBJtQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E517978.2020705@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Aug 21, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>=20
> gpart does not support (well, anyway) changing the underlying =
partition table format without committing changes. Replacing the =
partition scheme, which this does, is such an operation.

Weird. I could always destroy tables, create new ones using a
different scheme and populate it with partitions without there
being a single write to disk. The commit/undo logic worked
just as well for those operations as the simpler ones. Did that
get broken or are you just mistaken?

--=20
Marcel Moolenaar
marcel@xcllnt.net





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?64622705-80AB-4FEF-91E9-8F3041818B4E>