Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another question about pkgng Message-ID: <50B1422A.7070902@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <k8ralj$gu9$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <k8ralj$gu9$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote: > When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote > repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the remote > repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite. > > That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg update' first? That would be consistent with the way 'pkg upgrade' and 'pkg install' behave, so personally I think that would be a yes. Can you open an issue on Github so this point does not get forgotten please? https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCxQioACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzCNQCeP+qhYtiVkAGLQZOGXENSloTL es8AnAmJQBKSy6fTcXBdYsuZxmdKCVC+ =dBAY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B1422A.7070902>