Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:28:51 -0500
From:      Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org
Cc:        mikael@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Undefined symbol "setgroups@FBSD_1.8"
Message-ID:  <03bc5dd3-296b-4c39-9f5f-f42159b80da5@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <aO8iH0OI61BCPBn_@int21h>
References:  <aO7qm_KW_hTFCzll@int21h> <11DE790B-4E98-4D42-A281-E0B669474C89@yahoo.com> <aO8iH0OI61BCPBn_@int21h>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On 10/14/25 23:25, void wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 06:24:03PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
>> So: in some way an inappropriate mix of vintages seems to
>> be in use.
>>
>> Based on the messages, it appears that /overlays/sccache/bin/sccache
>> has or leads to loading something that the: "setgroups@FBSD_1.8"
>> reference. It possibly needs to be built for 13.5-RELEASE-p5 . That
>> would have no "setgroups@FBSD_1.8" reference to complain about.
> 
> This is stable/15 server running releng/13.5 poudriere jail.
> poudriere itself calls sccache via the sccache-overlay like
> 
> # poudriere bulk -j 135R-amd64 -O sccache -f filelist.txt
> 
> so it calls (externally) sccache materials built and installed on the host.
> So, what you're saying makes sense.
> But, I cannot install sccache for 13.5 on a stable/15 host. I saw nothing
> during install that sccache-overlay use must be with the same major freebsd version of host and builder.
> 
> Removing the -O sccache allows the build to proceed, some 500 or so packages.
> Do you think this an sccache{-overlay} problem?

If the whole point if sccache-overlay is that it can be dropped into jails, then it needs to
be using a statically-linked sccache to avoid ABI issues -- the current model isn't really
workable, it would seem.

Thanks,

Kyle Evans


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?03bc5dd3-296b-4c39-9f5f-f42159b80da5>