Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 20:47:11 +0000 From: "kczekirda (Kamil Czekirda)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D10485: Replace dhcp option 150 by 66 Message-ID: <5259c1de7a026fd49ebc842c7a4cb7cc@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-rdfe23ryefhflnjblbcr-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-rdfe23ryefhflnjblbcr-req@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
kczekirda added a comment. And the last one possible solution: In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10485#218945, @tsoome wrote: > But also there is much simpler way to distinguish NFS versus TFTP boot - because that is the problem - how to understand if we should go for NFS of for TFTP. And the idea is simple - if there is no server set, we opt to use next server option for nfs/tftp server; now the root_path syntax as such is not set, therefore we can just state that if the root_path is IP:/path then its NFS, if the root_path is /path, then it is TFTP. Don't use any of 66 or 150 option, but when root-path includes ip address - go thru NFS, if ip address not exists in root-path - go thru TFTP from server which ip address is in next-server. But there is one limitation - only one tftp server in network to provide loader and everything else. Does enybody use more than only one? REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10485 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: kczekirda, bapt, oshogbo, tsoome, sbruno, #network, freebsd-net-list, imp, jhb Cc: rgrimes, garga, ler, asomershelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5259c1de7a026fd49ebc842c7a4cb7cc>