Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:09:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Thomas Mueller <mueller23@insightbb.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211306290.1980@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <26.30.12873.06EE2EF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> References: <26.30.12873.06EE2EF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> force gcc build that MAYBE will work. possibly not. > > > My experience with NetBSD suggests you may be right there, but Linux? After commercial support got too much about directing decisions, NetBSD got very quickly useless. > > I'll have to build a new Linux installation and see for myself! Warning: You may not go through it healthy. > I'm still inclined to say FreeBSD 9.0 is an improvement over 8.2; I never got to 8.3. There are some new functionality. rctl may be very very very useful. But as for speed - i don't see it to be better, and at high disk I/O load it seems to get somehow longer stalls but it is subjective, no precise test done.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211306290.1980>