Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:44:49 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Martin Nilsson <martin@gneto.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-queue.c Message-ID: <7E666CD0-724D-45D4-B5BB-A1BE1858D28E@FreeBSD.ORG> In-Reply-To: <42C210F2.3020601@gneto.com> References: <200506280906.j5S96qIi053675@repoman.freebsd.org> <200506281310.50238.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <8EFCED13-E340-4C7D-A13B-3A5B01C4241E@FreeBSD.org> <200506281521.00598.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <04E48272-9625-406C-AF58-BA1A554FFC89@FreeBSD.org> <42C210F2.3020601@gneto.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29/06/2005, at 5:09, Martin Nilsson wrote: > S=F8ren Schmidt wrote: > >> Now, I do have a 5.4 version of ATA from current, but its unclear =20 >> to me if it is wanted/allowed into 5.x, and until that eventual =20 >> commit happens I'm out of the loop on ATA in 5.x which I also =20 >> stated repeatedly here on the lists. >> > > Hi S=F8ren, > is it possible to ask for an updated ATA-mkIII RELENG_5 patchset, > the one on your webpage (http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ATA/) is > from april and a lot of small fixes have gone into the drivers since > then. With ATA support being what it is in RELENG_5 it is hard to > decide if one should take chances with CURRENT or stick with 4.11 =20 > and just wait for 6.0 to be released. I've thought about doing a new patchset, but I'd rather have it in =20 RELENG_5 but it seems the jury is still out on that for quite some time. I'll get a new patchset uploaded, I just need a little time as things =20= are out of hand here due to upcoming vacations and what not :) > Thanks for your work! The ATA support (including intel RAID) in =20 > CURRENT works very well on the few boxes I dare to run it on. Thanks! one more happy customer :) - S=F8ren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7E666CD0-724D-45D4-B5BB-A1BE1858D28E>