Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 9 Dec 2018 06:50:06 -0500
From:      Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>
To:        freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Changes in porting based on new freeBSD support model?
Message-ID:  <8b873b66-8e67-64be-f9fa-17976756c67a@blastwave.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181208225640.44358223@ralga.knownspace>
References:  <CADHh_%2BrfKokqx6y73twP=voTfzUPQamaeTVaGALUm6GcpwA1ZA@mail.gmail.com> <20181208225640.44358223@ralga.knownspace>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/8/18 11:56 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 02:22:25 +0100
> Daniel Sharoh <d.sharoh@donders.ru.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry if this is question is not supposed to go here. I've been using
>> the freeBSD PPC port as a desktop since 10.3, which is now EoL. I see
>> freeBSD follows a new support model, but given the tier 2 status of
>> the PPC port, it is unclear to me how closely work for PPC tracks
>> fully supported architectures. Is there conventional wisdom about
>> when upgrading PPC freeBSD is sensible? It took a good deal of effort
>> to build a working system on this old iMac G5, and I'm not sure
>> attempting an upgrade is worth it if the main development target is
>> the newer POWER systems.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Although our primary new work is targeting the POWER systems, we have
> no plans to abandon the Apple PowerMac platforms.  Though I no longer
> have a working G5 for FreeBSD myself, I make every effort to debug with
> those who do, and anything that's shared with the G4 I can test on my
> various G4 systems.
> 
> - Justin


Speaking of which we xertainly do have a few issues after 341655 with
networking and smp but the flat device tree seems to be stable. It may
not be correct but we no longer have a panic.

Dennis Clarke



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8b873b66-8e67-64be-f9fa-17976756c67a>