Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 May 2017 16:41:31 -0400
From:      Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
To:        "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: After ino64 update: devel/libunwind failure: cannot preempt symbol '_Ux86_64_local_addr_space' defined
Message-ID:  <CAPyFy2AiQ33HmffZQb4UBdvPstxzOKeYYdYr33AVax6yfuP8eA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170530184849.6e6eafe6@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de>
References:  <20170529105949.1cecf4e2@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <CAPyFy2Bt-bM-2v2S_wM655-5SMUQdUfrz7EwiELRJrgAxgWtWQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170530184849.6e6eafe6@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 May 2017 at 12:49, O. Hartmann <ohartmann@walstatt.org> wrote:
>
> I got a kind of confused, since libunwind seemingly compiles on one box with both ino64
> AND WITH_LLD_IS_LD, while it failed after an update of a bunch of systems towards ino64.

So was this just confusion over what was actually built? I believe
libunwind should always fail with LLD.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2AiQ33HmffZQb4UBdvPstxzOKeYYdYr33AVax6yfuP8eA>