Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 18:55:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Suresh Rajagopalan <sraja@cinenet.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: "Gary D. Margiotta" <gary@tbe.net>, Cliff Addy <fbsdlist@federation.addy.com>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: T1 upgrade options? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970709185325.20208A-100000@hollywood.cinenet.net> In-Reply-To: <2735.868489228@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'll have to speak up for Livingston here -- we use them all the time for customer equipment and also dial in access, and while opinions on the admin interface are subjective, I have never seen a single box crash. > To use a car analogy, Cisco basically produces the Cadillacs of the > router world whereas Livingston makes Yugos and Ascend makes VWs. :-) > Not everyone needs, wants or can afford a Cadillac, but many of those > features are nice to have if you're going to drive a car at all. > Similarly, the "VW" is cheap but of reasonably good quality and the > Yugo, well, you buy one of those when cost is the #1 consideration and > you are resigned to the fact that it'll be no fun to drive and also > perhaps spend some amount of time by the side of the road, waiting for > the tow-truck. :-) >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.95.970709185325.20208A-100000>