Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 22:42:39 +0100 From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> To: "J. W. Ballantine" <jwb@homer.att.com> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: route pointing to a gateway that's not on net Message-ID: <20030315214239.GA23489@gvr.gvr.org> In-Reply-To: <200303142117.h2ELHdl21193@akiva.homer.att.com> References: <20030314202944.GA5071@gvr.gvr.org> <200303142117.h2ELHdl21193@akiva.homer.att.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 04:17:39PM -0500, J. W. Ballantine wrote: > > Of the 3 different possibilities mentioned: > > I did try route add -net without -iface, and the result was > no route to host. > > I didn't try to arp to 207.172.3.* hosts because that sounded like > a fix for only one small network and I asked for clarification. > > The other single host routes for each host again doesn't resolve the > larger issue of basic network access. > You already mentioned that adding the -iface route to 10.* in combination with a default route to your gateway worked for everything except 207.172.3.*. What I suggested would _add_ reachability of those hosts. -Guido To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030315214239.GA23489>