Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:24:05 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Radek_V=E1clav=EDk?= <radekvaclavik@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IPFW rules
Message-ID:  <20011126182405.A21196@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <013301c176cd$bd523860$fd6c2093@arvi>; from radekvaclavik@yahoo.com on Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:57:34PM %2B0100
References:  <013301c176cd$bd523860$fd6c2093@arvi>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:57:34PM +0100, Radek Václavík wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have already posted this questing on the news server, but didn't get an answer :-(. Perhaps someone here (maybe the author) can help.
> 
> My problem is this one: I have a network, which has a relatively slow
> connection out to the world. And due to a lots of ftp traffic, other
> services (like ssh, telnet, vnc..etc) are getting very slow because of high
> ping and packet loss. Therefore, I would like to set priority to packets at
> different ports (for the firewall to handle these packets prior to the other
> ones - like ftp). And this is it. How to create rule for this?
> I don't want to strictly restrict the bandwitch for ftp (to have full use of
> the line for ftp when not using the other services). And even if I'd decide
> to do so (rules for this work fine), I don't know, what ports to restrict
> ( 2o only doesn't work, cause a lot of users download from different ftp
> ports).

Use dummynet

Kris

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD4DBQE8AvlEWry0BWjoQKURAm3TAJ0QSOK0ngI2KM6djqvd7WN281Ff4gCXV8gc
3hdsjMJHgUn+LN0LAbp2zQ==
=RvTX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011126182405.A21196>