Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Sep 1998 00:04:30 -0600
From:      Allen Campbell <allenc@verinet.com>
To:        fpawlak@execpc.com
Cc:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Oracle and Linux
Message-ID:  <35F61A6E.CE370F1F@verinet.com>
References:  <199809081815.OAA02209@pechter.dyn.ml.org> <199809082013.NAA00438@dingo.cdrom.com> <19980908143112.A17826@verinet.com> <35F58E86.EB6ABE7@netvision.net.il> <19980908170914.A1662@darkstar.connect.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> IMHO, running under emulation does not have the same cool
> factor or wham effect as running native...

The way to work this is to turn it into an advantage.  Is there any
reason Oracle for Linux couldn't run _better_ on FreeBSD?  My own
experience is that FreeBSD is more stable and consistent.  Many credible
contributors have said that FreeBSD's virtual memory system is superior
to Linux.  So why not?  You can bet benchmarks of Linux vs. NT will be
done to death.  If FreeBSD makes a credible showing there it will be
hard to ignore.

-- 
  Allen Campbell       |  Lurking at the bottom of the
  allenc@verinet.com   |   gravity well, getting old.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35F61A6E.CE370F1F>