Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 13:00:53 +0100 From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-share@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.own.mk Message-ID: <199603131200.NAA00382@campa.panke.de> In-Reply-To: <199603121811.KAA14067@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> References: <199603121514.QAA00610@campa.panke.de> <199603121811.KAA14067@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rodney W. Grimes writes:
>> COPY?= should be in sys.mk, eight *.mk files use this variable.
>
>I disagree. sys.mk is pulled in by _all_ makes. Much of what is
>in there should not really be in there but in another *.mk file
>like bsd.own.mk, perhaps bsd.common.mk.
COPY is a *FLAGS variable for ${INSTALL}, every ${INSTALL} in bsd.*.mk
use ${COPY}.
Until someone rewrite sys.mk, bsd.common.mk etc. I vote for COPY?=
in sys.mk. Comments? Flames?
Wolfram
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603131200.NAA00382>