Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 19:51:14 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: mi@aldan.algebra.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firewall rules for applications Message-ID: <20000911195114.Z47559@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <200009112337.TAA27194@misha.privatelabs.com>; from mi@aldan.algebra.com on Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 07:37:21PM -0400 References: <20000911185759.W47559@jade.chc-chimes.com> <200009112337.TAA27194@misha.privatelabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 07:37:21PM -0400, mi@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
> = It's reasonable to assume it can be done, but its only going to slow down
> = ipfw even worse then it already is.
>
> But only if one chooses to use the new feature, right?
Bhahahahahahaha. No.
Once I can get in_pcblookup_hash to stop infinite looping (no details, just
happened), I'll have a patch that tries to avoid that problem.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000911195114.Z47559>