Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:13:51 +0200 From: Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@fgznet.ch> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: tools/kerneldoc Message-ID: <4A8465EF.7030604@fgznet.ch> In-Reply-To: <20090813081538.5361241c6z2lqcn4@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <4A832C70.4030600@fgznet.ch> <20090813081538.5361241c6z2lqcn4@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@fgznet.ch> (from Wed, 12 Aug > 2009 22:56:16 +0200): > >> Hi, >> >> does anybody care about this 'kerneldoc' package? > > [...] > >> I then dived into the subsys dir and started a 'make all'. >> >> Here too, I failed since a few .m files are no more or they are >> placed on a different place. Well, this was easy, more or less. >> Commenting them made the build work, but this is only half the >> truth, what about the new .m files? > > I have patches for the subsys part. A little bit more than only the .m > files fix: > http://www.leidinger.net/FreeBSD/current/patches/dox.diff Thanks, I tried it and I was surprised how long such a build took. Well, html and latex more than 5 hours on a p4 2.8GHz. And the amount of data is also huge, nearly 2GB of data. > I haven't tested a lot there, e.g. the USB stuff needs review, as I > didn't had a look at it since the new USB subsystem went in. > > Personally I care about the subsys part, but my spare time for it was > not enough lately. I have some hope that I can setup an automatic run > with the HTML files available on a public webserver after 8.0-release. > At the time I do this, I will also have the time to check everything > and commit the patches (I don't think this part is important enough to > fix it this late in the release process, on the other hand it is > something optional and a commit wouldn't hurt more than letting it in > the current shape...). I agree here, I do not think that this is release critical. I just wondered if anybody is in touch with this code at all. Could you enlight me with the meaning of the toplevel kerneldoc, is this kerneldoc package meant as a whole or is the benefit only in the subsys part? TIA, Andreas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A8465EF.7030604>