Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 01:22:57 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net> To: Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com> Cc: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102200116510.1377-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0102191517420.24075-100000@gandalf.bravenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
My company (online greeting cards) sent our 4 million emails in 4 hours using a cluster of about 30 mailers with qmail on FreeBSD (old version of FreeBSD at that). That averages to 16,666 mail messages per minute or about 500 per minute per server. The best part was the servers weren't breaking a sweat. Again as with all benchmarks you are talking about, there are lots of other factors then just "How fast does it push the mail." For what we do, qmail is a great solution. I've personally never looked at postfix, but I understand it to be a great MTA as well. I think in the end, you will find that both are very similar and that it's just a matter of personal preference. That being said, I'll be interested to see what the numbers come out to be. -gordon On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Dan Phoenix wrote: > I would like to set up this challenge early next week. > NOw that I have taken out the IO issue with the mail servers > ...already proved postfix did better on I/O so now i want to eliminate > that factor to 2 exactly the same machines. I running qmail ...1 running > postfix to see which MTA has better sending speed on freebsd. > > What I have not decided on is benchmark program to use..... > test will be how many outgoing it can send a sec for each. > I welcome benchmark proggies anyone can offer as a solution for this. > Much appreciated. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.31.0102200116510.1377-100000>