Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:52:25 +0300 From: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@FreeBSD.org.ua> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libkse & jdk14: signals(?) breakage Message-ID: <20030627005225.A25700@phantom.cris.net> In-Reply-To: <004d01c33b7f$ede4dc30$f001a8c0@davidw2k>; from davidxu@freebsd.org on Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:11:32AM %2B0800 References: <20030625133041.A12986@phantom.cris.net><Pine.GSO.4.10.10306250953210.22247-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20030625192326.A15424@phantom.cris.net> <004d01c33b7f$ede4dc30$f001a8c0@davidw2k>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:11:32AM +0800, David Xu wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:55:21AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > > > > > > > hi, > > > > ... > > > > Looks like signals are still not really working in libkse. > > > > > > David Xu is revamping signal handling (it also involves > > > some kernel changes). Very alpha patches are at: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/kse_sig/ > > > > > > They are not yet completely working, but might help. > > > > Cool! It really helped. At least visible behaviour is same to libc_r. > > > > Your test is appreciated. I have updated the patches again, > they have past signal test suites included in libpthread. > Can you test these new patches again ? > http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/kse_sig/kern.diff > http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/kse_sig/libpthread.tgz It just works. Comparing to first signal patches it behaves even better. I did not see any random process lockups. Build & all TCK's VM tests passed. Good job! > I am now working on code cleanup... > > > /me running TCK tests...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030627005225.A25700>