Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:40:38 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in.c Message-ID: <20050819094038.GV659@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20050819092219.GB57615@cell.sick.ru> References: <200508181034.j7IAYUSS015059@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050818232116.GS659@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050819092219.GB57615@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gleb, > J> > Add a sysctl switch net.inet.ip.same_prefix_carp_only. If the switch > J> > is on, then kernel will refuse to add an additional interface to > J> > already connected subnet unless the interface is CARP. Default > J> > value is off. > J> > J> First, thanks for you work. > J> Do you plan to drop a line about this in a manual page ? I would like > J> to help you on this, but I don't think I'm the good guy to do it, > J> since I don't even use carp(4) interfaces. > > The question is which man page to choose, so that people interested in > disabling this feature would find it themselves. Definitely not carp(4). > May be ip(4)? This sysctl is definitely carp(4)-centric, this is underlined by its name :-). I'm not sure why you don't want to put this is carp(4) manpage. Is it to make easier the future imports of the carp(4) subsystem from OpenBSD ? Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050819094038.GV659>