Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:39:23 +0100 From: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Option vs. flavor? Message-ID: <F2167B1B-9F8D-403D-8BDF-11E3507214F2@lastsummer.de> In-Reply-To: <11f773c6-7f69-0a4a-d100-018d40a65f48@rawbw.com> References: <ee10fa7f-9107-1c35-8540-ff34d306865d@rawbw.com> <20171216142849.GL10752@graf.pompo.net> <CAOc73CAe03AuLsgSvw1TfV7Ke9qLvGJtHpqowvF=KPnMOxOjxg@mail.gmail.com> <00619a7a-a812-1eac-bdb7-5cecfb891758@rawbw.com> <CAOc73CAqp9=-8T8czbhk3CP6B2iftkqdXau10JNzmPUXHF0UXg@mail.gmail.com> <11f773c6-7f69-0a4a-d100-018d40a65f48@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why not use a separate data package as optional dependency? Solves the condi= tional fetch. > On 16. Dec 2017, at 22:02, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote: >=20 >> On 12/16/17 12:42, Ben Woods wrote: >> Is there any reason why you want to avoid the download with the port =E2=80= =9Cmake >> fetch=E2=80=9D? >=20 > To not clog the package builder with huge unnecessary data? Or maybe this s= houldn't be a concern. >=20 >> This should not impact you if it uses subpackages and you just install th= e >> program with pkg. >=20 >=20 > But are subpackages already available? >=20 >=20 > Yuri >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F2167B1B-9F8D-403D-8BDF-11E3507214F2>