Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:16:14 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@FreeBSD.org>, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r233294 - in head: . contrib/com_err crypto/heimdal crypto/heimdal/admin crypto/heimdal/appl crypto/heimdal/appl/afsutil crypto/heimdal/appl/ftp crypto/heimdal/appl/ftp/common crypto/he... Message-ID: <B876AD09-CBA8-4228-9A9E-DA9D146D7D65@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F73D8A0.3040608@FreeBSD.org> References: <201203220848.q2M8mia8015593@svn.freebsd.org> <20120325105958.GB61230@zxy.spb.ru> <CAF-QHFW06n6u-9dhSfK5iakNdZor1uPY6NgPXPVQUrRRg95%2BOw@mail.gmail.com> <4F73D8A0.3040608@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 Mar 2012, at 04:36, Doug Barton wrote: > All of the stuff that pkgng relies on (including the tool itself) are > going to be in the ports collection, where they belong. We should have > moved pkg_* there years ago, but this change is at least a step in the > right direction. Wait... what? Why should pkgng be in ports (other than now, while it's = under development)? I'd like to see it used for managing some of the = optional parts of the base system and probably eventually replacing = freebsd-update, not have it as another bolt-on that is not part of the = core system. Not to mention the bootstrapping problem if every user who = wants to use binary packages needs to use ports to build pkgng. David=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B876AD09-CBA8-4228-9A9E-DA9D146D7D65>