Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:59:39 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/dns/powerdns Makefile Message-ID: <20050201145939.GF5153@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <41FF5143.23348.4B21BB15@localhost> References: <20050201111901.GM93795@voodoo.oberon.net> <41FF5143.23348.4B21BB15@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:52:03AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > Couldn't we just make BROKEN and IGNORE more consistent? > > You're not alone. > > Why not treat BROKEN, IGNORE, FORBIDDEN, DEPRECATED all the same? Is > there any reason they need to be different? Yes, this inconsistency should be fixed, so patches are also welcome. -Kirill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050201145939.GF5153>