Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Oct 2000 17:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010121712180.20179-100000@dt051n37.san.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <200010122222.e9CMMmG35106@netplex.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Peter Wemm wrote:

> Exposing sendmail to cron by default adds one more place that an admin may
> have to find and deal with when switching from sendmail to something else.

	True, but it's a pretty self-evident error. If cron tries to run
sendmail and gets the dreaded unexpected results, it is (or should be) an
obvious error. 

> IMHO, having sendmail *off* in rc.conf should mean "no sendmail at all",
> not having /usr/sbin/sendmail -q still being run behind your back.

	Please keep clear the fact that I am NOT advocating sendmail in
cron for any kind of default freebsd installation (nor do I think
anyone else is). You are correct that doing that would violate POLA in a
big way. 
 
> The daily processing shows the mailq already anyway.  If you don't at least
> occasionally read them, then you're not using the tools available to you.

	As someone pointed out already, if you are getting N periodic
e-mails already where N is a sufficiently large number that N - 1 emails
might go unnoticed for a few days, this could be a problem. 

Doug
-- 
        "The dead cannot be seduced."
		- Kai, "Lexx"

	Do YOU Yahoo!?




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0010121712180.20179-100000>