Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Jan 2011 00:25:33 -0500
From:      Chris Brennan <xaero@xaerolimit.net>
To:        Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Cc:        Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>, Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: a new hard-drive in a 2y/o laptop
Message-ID:  <AANLkTinfNLobzkC_s1crKosyHPPFaUcDsyx0DVVaNCja@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101062143420.27251@wonkity.com>
References:  <20101229120038.3DFB0106591A@hub.freebsd.org> <AANLkTinCZuupW%2BGFMeL70nPO90tZAAJNj8g0SaOztsR3@mail.gmail.com> <20101231105353.S36121@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <AANLkTinSbE8d=iYES78GJmYO2PyOAGHMjwQ%2B2HT45yxc@mail.gmail.com> <20110102102255.00004f57@unknown> <20110102230702.N49334@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20110103022619.O49334@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <AANLkTimkCdtULT9jfNtwKcfxF8R-TQ_j=qZgS-Y-YGfu@mail.gmail.com> <20110104143245.P49334@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <AANLkTi=Aqh4cpmdkHx1QsTyoYh7nhinEfDUuPO3fUAh5@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101041840310.14633@wonkity.com> <20110105152725.U49334@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <AANLkTinfVLGomOj-Nanvr4sgei-p=HQ9-Mh0rXQQ7E%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <20110106160720.B49334@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <AANLkTimXQXmk2t8xBN1H7fWkyNo%2BFyasU8KaSeakpnUJ@mail.gmail.com> <20110106230849.H49334@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101061423570.23404@wonkity.com> <AANLkTi=1Zk2-Us=z9vyR6RcoodaPOxj=4BtXvCtYosKh@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101062143420.27251@wonkity.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote:

>  destroy -F is supposed to mean "Forced destroying of the partition table
> even if it is not empty."  But compare to this thread on the forum earlier
> today: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=20731
>
> Maybe -F isn't quite as brutal as it needs to be.
>
>
I still can't find any documentation on this in the manpages? HA! I just
finished skimming the above thread, -F is indeed new and not in 8.1. I am
going to set up a local mirror of 7.x, 8.x and HEAD over the next week and
if I remember, I'll be sure to check it out and see if it does infact exist
in 8.2.


>  So my question is this now, once gpart has touched a disk, does it have
>> the partition-aids now?
>>
>
> GPT does seem to be tenacious, and I'm wondering if maybe there's something
> left in RAM that's written back to the disk on shutdown.
>
>
Sneaky ... but possibly not likely since I more then once pulled the plug
and didn't give it time to actually write anything. Either way, between your
link and Bruce's, all is well.


>
>  Moving on, I then continued the standard process listed by your link,
>> bsdlabel'd my layout and saved it, when I do an 'ls -lsga /dev | grep ad4' I
>> see that I have partitions a,b,d,e,f
>> and I was able to newfs each one of them
>>
>> Next question, from this point (at the fixit prompt) can I preform a
>> manual install of just base? if I can get the system installed at this point
>> then all should be good when I reboot.
>>
>
> I would just boot the install CD, enter q and the fdisk screen, enter the
> mountpoints and q at the label screen, and let it do the rest.


See, I did that the first time and it all came to a screaming halt. That's
when I started to get creative with Ian. I'm going to take a stab in the
dark and blame Seagate for kludging the disk on me. Either way, a manual
fdisk and bsdlabel did the trick, it's got to be something in sysinstall not
liking what ever was written there by gpart...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinfNLobzkC_s1crKosyHPPFaUcDsyx0DVVaNCja>