Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 04:10:28 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: phk@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org>, <arch@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: New scheduler - Interactivity fixes Message-ID: <20030129040835.G31308-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <36865.1043771568@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 phk@FreeBSD.ORG wrote: > > > > scheduler 4bsd > > #scheduler ule > > This is just putting duck-tape over the hole rather than fix it. > > Config(8) barely managed to get a one-dimensional view of the options, > it needs to learn about dependencies in a proper way, rather than > to add magic keywords for all kernel parts. > Yes, I agree with this. I have no intentions of hacking up config though. In the absence of a real dependency mechanism I might be swayed to do some duct-tape. Perhaps we could come up with a spec and propose the idea to someone who is inclined to work on these sorts of things? I know peter had some good ideas for this. Cheers, Jeff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030129040835.G31308-100000>