Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:34:55 +0000 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu>, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@FreeBSD.org>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r227536 - in head: release share/man/man7 Message-ID: <AD227A51-FE06-4D9F-B1F2-D14B3EA08A32@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111117143149.GA96475@FreeBSD.org> References: <201111151849.pAFInR3K012609@svn.freebsd.org> <20111116.232828.343708041526200614.nyan@FreeBSD.org> <4EC3D40A.5040204@freebsd.org> <1321457050.78238.10.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <20111117124210.GB2051@garage.freebsd.pl> <1321535020.82271.5.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <20111117143149.GA96475@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 Nov 2011, at 14:31, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>>> Kinda gross but "FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso"? >>> >>> Can't we use one if they are equal? >> >> I'd prefer consistency. [...] > > But it looks so plain stupid! I've had someone ask me what amd64-amd64 meant when I pointed them as the RC announcement. I replied that I had no idea and suggested that possibly RE had been handed over to the department of redundancy department. Having read this thread, I can now confidently say... that I still have no idea. But (with my compiler-writer hat on) please tell me that we're not inventing yet another incompatible form of target triple. We have at least twice as many as we need already... David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AD227A51-FE06-4D9F-B1F2-D14B3EA08A32>