Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 23:12:27 -0500 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 Message-ID: <4EBCA0AB.60200@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=UEoGZ4Nvdwe8=tLw4P4tr20h3YFN7ga8-XBpUNMq4hw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201111100705.pAA75eIT023291@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <4EBB7A0A.20700@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-Vmokkwge%2Bu7BAJhq9Gu0Wqp0afuEPM2s1zPtmVqkFzFPr1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomakUnr-GvgHkSHnQzDCGCdqPQ6k6cJfMiSYTn6mBnVHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=UEoGZ4Nvdwe8=tLw4P4tr20h3YFN7ga8-XBpUNMq4hw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi, On 11/10/11 12:15 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > The problem right now is that when the code is compiled as a module, > it sucks in -all- of the chipset support rather than only a subset. > So there are two problems: > Is it too disruptive for the offending commit to be reverted, so the tinderbox emails can be silenced? -- Glen Barber | gjb@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Documentation Project [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOvKCxAAoJEFJPDDeguUaj5asH/Rbei3x82xKfHbHSgpHyioFt RQfMTQPWW50W5Cqnt1l6xmzZpzD/LB31MKdFB04Eb/p7bt8oX37Al3T3jUdRyfz9 cw3VTSt21h6Cdd6+vYiZPsSCyee7GgjD/jkFO+rENaOoSQVxHjn7QfEWt13T+MZI 7mO5/I02ahAQI1bWhkyQF1/Klsjx7eeiCJHbzyRYxF72q4n8497CBGfgTK5wSsZE tvu1tUbkBqonIsmk65zrFUugWX+CHgHI78jw8TRTVHsoieVIOqlBBav6Ur773qQf UO1DWpxhXQYETUMe4tsR/ahxY9/g4Rbx/btEe3o+bwjmzBQ95+b1PIxq0J6MVKI= =jnV/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EBCA0AB.60200>